West Ken Residents Visit Secretary of State Greg Clark

Presenting alternative plan for homes threatened by Earls Court redevelopment

Related links

Save Earls Court Petition

Department for Communities and Local Government

H&F Council Leader Admits "Too Late" to Save exhibition Centres

West Ken Residents Vote to Investigate Community Takeover

Earls Court Developer CapCo Says "Re-imagination" is Moving Closer

Planning Applications Committee Agenda for April 3

Earls Court Area Action Group Hold House of Commons Press Conference

Earls Court Area Action Group

Earls Court Developer Buys Empress State Building

Earls Court "Community Benefits" Plan Agreed

Legal Challenge to Earls Court Plans Dismissed

Eric Pickles Will Not "Call In" Earls Court Plans

Capco and TfL Agree to Earls Court Venture

Transport for London Announcement

Boris Johnson's announcement

Earls Court Developer Shows Off Future Plans

Fury over Mayor's Green Light for Earls Court Redevelopment

Green Light for Controversial Earls Court Redevelopment

"The Future of Earls Court is in Boris Johnson's Hands"

MP Andy Slaughter's Submission to the Mayor

Earls Court Developer Buys Empress State Building

Legal Challenge to Earls Court Plan Dismissed

Govt Consents to Transfer of West Kensington Estates

Residents' Letter to Eric Pickles

West Ken Residents Suffer Double Setback

West Ken Residents Granted Judicial Review

Mayor Under Pressure to Reject Earls Court Plan

Council Grants Outline Planning Permission for Earls Court Scheme

Residents' Deputation Statement

Register for the Shepherd's Bush Newsletter

Get the Hammersmith newsletter

Register for the Fulham Newsletter

On Friday 23 October, West Kensington and Gibbs Green Residents visited the offices of the Department for Communities and Local Government to present the Secretary of State Greg Clark with their case for an alternative plan for the 760 homes threatened with demolition as part of the Earl’s Court redevelopment.

The residents asked the Secretary of State to permit them to exercise their Right to Transfer ownership of the two estates from Hammersmith and Fulham Council (LBHF) to a community owned landlord controlled by the residents.

They hope to use Section 34A of the 1985 Housing Act to take forward their proposal to retain and invest in existing properties and work with their neighbours to plan new affordable homes on infill sites.

Alongside evidence to support their cause, tenants and homeowners from the estates handed over a petition signed by residents from the majority of households calling for a community-led alternative to the scheme currently being renegotiated between the LBHF and Capco, the developer.

Keith Drew, resident of 43 years and chair of West Ken Gibbs Green Community Homes, says: " The majority of residents have consistently opposed demolition, 80% according to the council’s own consultation in 2012.

" The developer’s plan is especially disruptive for Right to Buy homeowners since the compensation they would get for their home would be insufficient for them to buy a replacement home in the area.

" The council is currently renegotiating the scheme with the developer. It is rumoured that the number of homes additional to those already approved will run into the thousands rather than the hundreds.

" This is bound to prove unpopular with people in the surrounding areas and generate significant controversy in the run-up to the Mayoral election.

" The community has been kept out of these discussions. We believe we can achieve a much more satisfactory regeneration scheme by retaining popular housing and building new homes on infill sites around the estates."

Residents initiated the process on 11 August by serving notice of their intentions to Hammersmith and Fulham Council. The council subsequently responded by asking the Secretary of State to make a determination against the proposals.

The Council claims that the proposed transfer would have a significant detrimental effect on the regeneration of the area and would prevent it receiving receipts from a land sale contract with the developer.

However, in their submission residents pointed out that:

  • The transfer does not prevent regeneration since the land sale agreement already anticipates transfer of the estates;
  • Even if the estates are excluded, the developer will still be developing significant landholdings in the area;
  • No progress has been made with the scheme for redeveloping the estates in the past two and a half years;
  • No detailed planning permissions have been obtained, the first phase of the demolition has not been agreed and the residents’ contracts have not been finalised;
  • Both Capco and LBHF want to change the current scheme, which would require revision to the sale agreement and a fresh outline planning application;
  • The Council’s financial receipts from the developer will be more than soaked up by its expenditure on the scheme.

Homeowner Iona Bain, who handed in our submission, said: " I am very worried about the demolition scheme and have lived with this worry for years while the area has been blighted by uncertainty.

" I worked very hard to buy my flat here and I have invested a lot of money and time in my community to make it my home. I feel totally let down by the promise of homeownership.

" I just hope the Secretary of State will listen to us and support the will of the local community."

October 30, 2015