H & F Council Slams NHS A&E Consultation Results

And says petitions containing thousands of signatures counted as one response

Related Links

Ipsos MORI Report in Full

Save Our Hospitals

Council Issues Formal Response as NHS Consultation Ends

H & F Council's suggested responses to the consultation

Video of public meeting at Hammersmith Town Hall

London Health Emergency

Report by Timothy Rideout

Save Our Hospitals in Ealing

QPR Stars are Latest to Join A&E Campaign

Fulham FC Footballers Join Fight Against Local A&E Closures

Safe in Our Hands - Keep A&E at Chelsea and Westminster


Ten reasons why you should support the campaign

Factsheet - what the proposals mean for Hammersmith and Fulham residents

Public Anger Builds over A&E Closures

Residents Vow to Fight A&E Closures

Meeting over NHS Closures Set for Rivercourt Church


Save Charing Cross

Save Hammersmith

Statement on Closures from MP Andy Slaughter

Save Charing Cross Online Petition

Council Issues Angry Response to Proposed NHS Closures

Shock NHS Report Proposes Closure of Local A&Es

Shaping a Healthier Future

NHS North West London


Register for the Shepherd's Bush Newsletter

Get the Hammersmith newsletter

Register for the Fulham Newsletter

Hammersmith and Fulham Council has reacted furiously to publication of the results of NHS North West's Shaping a Healthier Future public consultation.

The council slams the results as flawed, with petitions containing thousands of signatures counted as a single response and accuses spin doctors of trying to bury bad news by releasing their consultation results on the same day that the Leveson Report is released.

You can download read the Shaping a Healthier Future Report, produced by Ipsos MORI, here.

The report itself also reveals that out of 17,022 submissions, which include the petitions counted as a single submission, over 9,000 came a campaign organised by Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.

This campaign has been strongly criticised as it asks local people to campaign to save one local hospital's A &E department by closing another. There is no option offered in the consultation to vote to keep all departments open.

The council says the flawed results on NHS North West London's plans to close A&E services in four London hospitals have been greeted with a wave of anger and disbelief in west London.

66,000 signatures included in 18 petitions have only been counted as 18 responses. Despite a vociferous campaign by local residents' groups and their councils, NHS North West London yesterday tried to claim of majority support for its preferred option to close services.

H & F Council has vowed to continue its battle to protect local health services, and says this is another nail in the coffin for Charing Cross that will eventually lead to the closure of the site.

Cllr Nicholas Botterill, H&F Council Leader, says: “It is outrageous that the voices of 66,000 people have been silenced.

“Nobody should be in any doubt that the long-term strategy is the closure of Charing Cross itself. We will do everything we can to protect the site and the hospital’s future. This includes potentially challenging the decision with the Secretary of State.

He added: "NHS NWL London may and silence our residents, but H&F Council will make sure that their voices continue to be heard loud and clear. We will do everything possible to save our hospitals. "

The consultation cost taxpayers £7million and, despite being branded a ‘sham’ and ‘fundamentally flawed’, the results now threatens the future of Charing Cross and Hammersmith hospitals.

Former NHS chief executive Timothy Rideout spelt out a series of major concerns with the consultation earlier this year. Describing the business case as ‘unsafe’ Mr Rideout criticised a failure to explore alternatives to A&E closures; failure to independently verify the financial modelling and the ‘funnel effect’ of the chosen methodology in the consultation which knocked out viable alternatives before they had a chance to be fairly compared.

But NHS NWL is using their flawed consultation to justify its predetermined preferred option of closing four out of nine A&E units. While the council is warning that if Charing Cross A&E is shut parts of the site will be sold off for redevelopment eventually leading to the closure of the whole hospital.

More than 66,000 people signed petitions to save the four hospitals while the council also points out that:

* GPs have publicly stated their opposition to the closure of two A&E units in the borough as they are not yet ready to provide the alternative care that will be needed.
* Ambulance journey times to overstretched out-of-borough A&Es will increase dramatically – potentially endangering lives, especially for victims of stroke.
* If the current NHS proposals go ahead, the remaining A&E’s would be severely over stretched as they would need to cater for nearly 400,000 people each – at least 50% more than the national average.
* No evidence has been provided that moving Charing Cross services to Chelsea & Westminster Hospital would improve outcomes for residents.
* With thousands of news homes and jobs coming to H&F the borough needs more local health care capacity, not less.

H&F Council has been warning for years that Charing Cross is being systematically downgraded. In December 2010 the vascular surgery ward at Charing Cross was closed, apparently because of a severe infection outbreak. All vascular surgery was moved to St Mary’s, in Paddington, where it remains, apparently permanently. There was no public consultation on the move and no clinical evidence presented to support the permanent move.

In 2009 Charing Cross was overlooked as the major trauma centre for the area and all six of Charing Cross’ world famous neurosurgeons were forced to provide an on call service at both St Mary’s and Charing Cross without consultation.

If Charing Cross is stripped of its A&E it could free-up lots of room for residential re-development, according to the council. Charing Cross is owned by Imperial College NHS Trust, which historically has been one of the most indebted trusts in London. The Trust would pocket the cash from a sale or redevelopment of any part of the Charing Cross site if they are successful in securing Foundation status.

Cllr Botterill concludes: “There is no evidence that the downgrades of local hospitals will miraculously lead to improved healthcare for our residents. In fact there is a growing suspicion that Charing Cross is being drained of life so that Imperial can sell off parts of this extremely valuable site and plug the black hole in their finances.

“NHS bureaucrats are putting the improvement of their balance sheet before the improvement of residents’ health and we are going to fight them all the way.”

Local feelings about the plans, which involve closing A & E departments in Hammersmith and Fulham has been running high, with two ongoing campaigns against the proposals.

Save Our Hospitals is run by a group of local people along with MP Andy Slaughter. You can find out more about the Save our Hospitals and offers your supports at the website  and follow it on twitter, hashtag #Saveourhospitals.

You can read more about Hammersmith and Fulham Council's opposition to the plans on its website at Save Charing Cross Hospital and Save Hammersmith Hospital.

November 29, 2012