Forum Topic

Council Tax Cut by 3% this year

I tried to post this earlier, so forgive me if it comes up twice"Tax cutting council bucks national trendAs council tax bills continue to soar across the country one London council is leading the way in cutting bills and providing top class front line services.Hammersmith & Fulham residents are set to see their council tax bills go down for the first time in over a decade. The council is proposing a 3 per cent council tax cut which is expected to be the biggest council tax drop in London – maybe the whole country.On average council tax has risen by 86 per cent in the last decade with taxpayers now braced for another round of hefty hikes. Londoners have seen their bills increase more quickly than any other tax since 1997 placing a huge burden on everyone, not least pensioners, the less well off and those on fixed incomes. The Mayor of London has also just announced a double whammy of huge fare rises on buses and the tube as well has his annual increase in his share of the bill.But in Hammersmith & Fulham the burden is being lifted with a lighter tax take and more cash for key front line services like schools and in cracking down on crime.Cllr Stephen Greenhalgh, Hammersmith & Fulham Council leader, says, “This is the first budget since the May 2006 election and we are combining lower tax with more cash for things that matter to residents. The council is pumping in £1.5million over two years to pay for round the clock beat policing in our town centres as well as spending more on schools and providing free homecare for our most vulnerable residents.”“We were elected to cut council tax bills and deliver better front line services and this is what our first budget does. While other councils are piling more tax on their residents we are reversing that trend and turning back the clock so that our council tax is now at 2004 levels. That's got to be great news for everyone, particularly for our pensioners and those on low incomes.”Across the 32 boroughs and the City of London the average local tax burden has soared by 86 per cent since 1996-97, about twice the rate pay has gone up, so, as Councillor Greenhalgh explains, tax cuts are possible without affecting front line services. Councillor Greenhalgh continues, "Delivering on our council tax promises means cutting waste and bureaucracy and looking to the market to see if services can be delivered more efficiently. We are not ideologically wedded to privatisation but surely it is prudent for in house services to be forced to compete with private contractors to see if the same, or even better, services can be delivered more efficiently.”Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the Taxpayers’ Alliance says, “Council tax has doubled in ten years and some people now think annual increases are inevitable.  So it’s good news for taxpayers in Hammersmith & Fulham that the council is leading the way with a good cut that will start giving pensioners and hardworking families more of their own money to spend on their own priorities. We hope this starts a trend across London.”Hammersmith & Fulham’s cut comes as other councils are moving in the other direction, piling the pressure on their taxpayers and struggling to keep rises below the government imposed ceiling of 5 per cent. And it’s not just inefficient councils that taxpayers should be frightened of.“It’s true that the Mayor of London’s hike, in his share of the bill, will eat into a large part of the savings we have made,” continues Cllr Greenhalgh. “We have no control over what he does and although we have highlighted our concerns to him in the strongest possible terms – he just doesn’t seem to care.”The budget report, which proposes the tax cuts, will be examined in a series of public scrutiny meetings early in the New Year before going to full council for final approval on February 28.Cllr Greenhalgh concludes, “This budget is a good start, but it is only the beginning. Providing value for money drives everything we are doing to transform the town hall. We will be one of the only councils in the country to cut council tax this year and the benefits will be felt by everyone when lighter bills drop through their doors.“It is important that people understand these tax cuts are not at the expense of frontline services. We are cutting council waste, red tape and bureaucracy and, as councils like our neighbours Wandsworth have proved, it is possible to have excellent frontline services and low council tax. “Residents should compare our efficiency to the Mayor of London’s tax escalator which will once again go up in 2007/8. He is going to hammer taxpayers with an increase of well over 5 per cent as well as clobbering commuters with a 33 per cent hike.”

Mark Loveday ● 6744d40 Comments

Stephen.I accept you want to make your political points, and it's a free country. However, you know what you are talking about is nonsense:* We have of course proposed closure of Hurlingham & Chelsea School. I'm afraid we had to do this because you and your Labour predecessors ran secondary school education in the borough into the ground with the result that we have the highest proportion of empty secondary schools places in the whole country. This has nothing to do with the Council Tax cut (and you know this because it has been explained to you and your colleagues). Not a penny of the tax cut comes from H&C closure.* Primary places. This is interesting. Sounds like you are going to oppose all the first rate new primary provision we hope to deliver under our new primary schools strategy. I can't wait to see you arguing this one! However, primary budgets again have nothing to do with the general funds of the Council so having better primary schools won't affect the level of Council Tax.* We have increased and tightened up some charges - as you always did year on year. With inflation under this government at its highest level for a decade, this is something all Councils do and you would have done the same.* "slashing" street cleaning by £900,000. We are looking for big reductions in these costs by market testing - which will result in the same or a better service. Sounds as if you are against getting it done more cheaply!Our reductions have come from (for example) scrapping the hugely expensive glossy HFM magazine and replacing it with H&F newspaper at a saving of £250,000 a year and scrapping all those personal advisers you used to employ to do your beck and call when you lorded it at the Town Hall.The utter hypocrisy of all this is that you are at same time telling people you could have delivered an even bigger tax cut! Where would you have found the extra £4, £5 or £6 million to fund this? Presumably by implementing the kind of economies we have done - and a lot more.No. The reality is you would have put taxes up just like every other Labour Council in London is doing for 2007/08.Can't you have at least the integrity to stick to what you were saying before the election - namely that you would increase taxes?The reality is that we promised a tax cut last year. The voters voted for it and we delivered it. You delivered big tax increases year after year - so don't pretend you would have done anything else.

Mark Loveday ● 6732d